DDL - UMR 5596
ISH - Bat C
14 avenue Berthelot
69007 Lyon
Tél : 04 72 72 64 12
Fax : 04 72 72 65 90


Previous Month Janvier 2015 Previous Month
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1

  Plusieurs évènements
 Vous êtes ici : Accueil /  Évènements / Calendrier

mer. 28/01/2015 Séminaire DTT : Conférence Keren Rice
ISH, Salle Elise Rivet
Conférence de :
  • Keren Rice (University of Toronto)

dans le cadre de l'axe Description, Typologie, Variation

‘Dismantling’ in a polysynthetic language? A Dene (Slavey) perspective

In Athabaskan languages, the verb word is complex, with prefixes generally divided into two types, conjunct (largely functional) and disjunct (largely lexical). It is agreed that the former are older additions to the verb word than the latter; it is also agreed that the latter as well as the former are part of the verb word.
Disjunct and conjunct prefixes are distinguished in several ways in the Dene (Slavey) language complex, but, in most varieties, there are ways in which their patterning is not distinct. The Fort Good Hope (FGH) variety exhibits an interesting and unexpected pattern, with developments that render the disjunct prefixes more distinct from the conjunct prefixes than in related varieties of the language. In particular, in other varieties, there are conditions under which a nasal conjunct prefix can be realized as nasalization on a disjunct prefix; this is not found in FGH. In addition, in FGH, verb stem tones appear on the syllable preceding the stem, with a new tone arising when the stem tone is displaced onto a conjunct prefix but not when it is displaced onto a disjunct prefix. Finally, vowel hiatus is resolved in FGH in one way if one of the vowels is in a disjunct and the other in a conjunct prefix and in a different way when both are in conjunct prefixes; other varieties do not clearly distinguish between the source of the vowels and allow for hiatus in environments where it is not found in FGH.
I ask why, given the tendency towards incorporation across the family and, in addition, the general lack of evidence for “dismantling” in polysynthetic languages, there is a tendency in FGH to strengthen the distinction between conjunct and disjunct prefixes, with a kind of dismantling. I explore two avenues. The first is linguistic. Given phonological developments in FGH, nasalization crossing the disjunct boundary would lead to allomorphy with some disjunct prefixes; by disallowing conjunct nasals to be realized on disjunct prefixes, such allomorphy is reduced. Different types of hiatus resolution and tone creation depending on the type of prefix also distinguish these prefix types more clearly. In FGH, there is a bias towards greater phonological distinction between disjunct and conjunct prefixes, at the expense of the integration into the verb word found in other varieties. That the “dismantling” affects disjunct prefixes alone points to the importance of structure, and the awareness of structure in the verb word. The second perspective is sociocultural. There is a long history of relationships between the Dene of FGH and the Gwich’in. While Dene varieties are similar, Gwich’in underwent many changes that make it quite distinctive. From a socio-cultural perspective, perhaps contact between FGH Dene and the Gwich’in was a factor in leading to the further differentiation of the disjunct prefixes from the conjunct prefixes, making lexical material more highly salient.


ASLAN -  Université de Lyon -  CNRS -  Université Lumière Lyon 2 -  MSH-LSE -  IXXI -  DDL :  Contact |  Mentions légales |